
Some people say that Hitchcock is the lord of suspense, but i really don't think he is. The only time that i thought he was actually suspenseful, was when the main character's girlfriend is going into the bad guy's apartment in Rear Window. The fact that the main lady is always a blond, is kind of scary. Even if I had a fetish towards blonds, I wouldn't have a blond in every single movie that I make.
Hitchcock movies have a lot of shots similar in every movie. I think that the way he uses montages makes the movie lag on and on and makes you drift away from the characters. The thing that makes the character go on even though it had nothing to do with the story, doesn't seem to be that important. Some of them were really hard to catch. They added nothing to the film, and thus is pointless in my opinion
Even though I openly don't like Hitchcock, I have to say that Hitchcock has done some pretty cool things. The 1st that i want to mention is in Rope. He tried to make most of the movie look like it was done in one shot. Thats really cool. 2nd, the very 1st movie that he ever made in the United States won best picture. Not many people can say that about themselves. It's too bad that he never won another grammy in that category again. And lastly, how badass is it. to be able to say that you were in every one of your films in some way or another?
Overall, I would not choose Hitchcock over Kirosawa or Chan. One of the main reasons that i don't like him is probably because i'm an action junky, and birds flying at a window doesn't really read, ACTION HERE NOW.
